<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="/stylesheets/rss.css"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/" xmlns:xcal="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:xcal" xmlns:enc="http://www.solitude.dk/syndication/enclosures/">
  <channel>
    <title>Hill Heat: Polar Bear Fate Heats Up</title>
    <link>http://www.hillheat.com/articles/2008/01/30/polar-bear-fate-heats-up</link>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <ttl>40</ttl>
    <description>Science Policy Legislation Action</description>
    <item>
      <title>Polar Bear Fate Heats Up</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Senate Hearing&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;


	&lt;p&gt;In &lt;a href="http://www.hillheat.com/events/2008/01/30/the-threats-and-protections-for-the-polar-bear"&gt;today&amp;#8217;s Senate Environment and Public Works Committee hearing&lt;/a&gt; on the Fish and Wildlife Service&amp;#8217;s now-illegal delay in ruling whether polar bears are an endangered species, Sen. Boxer (D-Calif.) sharply rebuked the &lt;span class="caps"&gt;FWS&lt;/span&gt; director Dale Hall. She noted that the Alaska field office sent a recommended decision to Hall on December 14th of last year. Hall refused to discuss the recommendation, saying it would be &amp;#8220;inappropriate&amp;#8221; to discuss internal deliberations.&lt;/p&gt;


	&lt;p&gt;Hall gave as his only reason for the delay past the January 8 deadline the need to present a &amp;#8220;high-quality&amp;#8221; decision that responds in full to the voluminous public comments received. He stated that there was no significant scientific uncertainty in the endangerment posed by global warming to polar bears, the only reason for delay the Endangered Species Act permits. Under repeated questioning from Sens. Boxer and Lautenberg (D-N.J.), Hall said he wanted to present a decision, if possible, by February 6th.&lt;/p&gt;


	&lt;p&gt;Hall noted that in many ways the Marine Mammals Protection Act provides stronger protection than the Endangered Species Act for polar bears even if a finding of endangerment were made &amp;#8211; a claim criticized by Andrew Wetzler of &lt;span class="caps"&gt;NRDC&lt;/span&gt;, who noted that the &lt;span class="caps"&gt;MMPA&lt;/span&gt; does nothing to protect critical habitat, the matter which would affect the planned sale of drilling rights in the Chukchi Sea.&lt;/p&gt;


	&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;span class="caps"&gt;MMS&lt;/span&gt; Speaks&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;


On that front, Ben Gemen reports for &lt;a href="http://www.eenews.net/eenewspm/print/2008/01/30/5"&gt;E&amp;#38;E News&lt;/a&gt; that Minerals Managment Service director Randall Luthi said any delay of the scheduled February 6 sale of Chukchi Sea leases would prevent any oil-and-gas exploration in 2008. However, he also stated that the agency position is that:
&lt;blockquote&gt;there is no need for a delay, regardless of what &lt;span class="caps"&gt;FWS&lt;/span&gt; decides. He said that even in the absence of a listing, energy development is accompanied by several layers of environmental review and safeguards, including collaboration with &lt;span class="caps"&gt;FWS&lt;/span&gt; and the National Marine Fisheries Service.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

	&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Kerry Moves to Block&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;


	&lt;p&gt;Meanwhile, Sen. Kerry (D-Mass.) &lt;a href="http://kerry.senate.gov/cfm/record.cfm?id=291475"&gt;introduced legislation yesterday&lt;/a&gt; that would block lease sales in the Arctic until Endangered Species Act decisions are made on the polar bear and its critical habitat, mirroring Rep. Markey&amp;#8217;s (D-Mass.) &lt;a href="http://www.hillheat.com/articles/2008/01/17/rep-markey-introduces-bill-to-block-alaska-drilling-pending-polar-bear-decision"&gt;proposed legislation&lt;/a&gt; in the House.&lt;/p&gt;


	&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Internal Emails Show &lt;span class="caps"&gt;MMS&lt;/span&gt; Staff Outcry&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;


	&lt;p&gt;Finally, Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility has released over the past week &lt;a href="http://www.peer.org/news/news_id.php?row_id=974"&gt;communications from &lt;span class="caps"&gt;MMS&lt;/span&gt; scientists&lt;/a&gt; pleading with the political appointees to delay the lease sale (contrary to &lt;a href="http://www.hillheat.com/events/2008/01/17/on-thin-ice-the-future-of-the-polar-bear"&gt;Luthi&amp;#8217;s January 17th testimony&lt;/a&gt;) and &lt;a href="http://www.peer.org/news/news_id.php?row_id=977"&gt;&lt;span class="caps"&gt;DOI&lt;/span&gt; directives&lt;/a&gt; forbidding &lt;span class="caps"&gt;MMS&lt;/span&gt; scientists to consider the possible threat of invasive species from opening the seas to drilling.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 18:05:00 -0600</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">urn:uuid:c6094b4f-708d-4554-8045-10206f8bc304</guid>
      <author>The Cunctator</author>
      <link>http://www.hillheat.com/articles/2008/01/30/polar-bear-fate-heats-up</link>
      <category>Science</category>
      <category>Policy</category>
      <category>polar bear</category>
      <category>Arctic</category>
      <category>oil</category>
      <category>gas</category>
      <category>ESA</category>
      <category>FWS</category>
      <category>MMS</category>
      <category>offshore drilling</category>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.hillheat.com/articles/trackback/1853</trackback:ping>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
