<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="/stylesheets/rss.css"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/" xmlns:xcal="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:xcal" xmlns:enc="http://www.solitude.dk/syndication/enclosures/">
  <channel>
    <title>Hill Heat: Report Vindicates Sebelius: Coal&#8217;s Cost Puts Kansans 'At Significant Risk'</title>
    <link>http://www.hillheat.com/articles/2008/03/26/report-vindicates-sebelius-coal%E2%80%99s-cost-puts-kansans-at-significant-risk</link>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <ttl>40</ttl>
    <description>Science Policy Legislation Action</description>
    <item>
      <title>Report Vindicates Sebelius: Coal&#8217;s Cost Puts Kansans 'At Significant Risk'</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Originally posted at the &lt;a href="http://thinkprogress.org/wonkroom/2008/03/26/coal-sebelius/"&gt;Think Progress Wonk Room&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;


	&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/uploads/2007/05/sebered.gif" style="float:right;margin-left:10px"/&gt; In October of last year, the administration of Kansas Gov. Kathleen Sebelius (D) &lt;a href="/articles/2007/10/18/kansas-blocks-new-coal-plants"&gt;denied permits for two new coal-fired plants&lt;/a&gt; in her state because the greenhouse gases such coal plants would emit constitute a threat to the environment and public health. Last Friday, she &lt;a href="/articles/2008/03/21/kansas-governor-vetoes-attempt-to-override-denial-of-coal-plants"&gt;vetoed a legislative attempt&lt;/a&gt; to allow the plants to be built. Opponents of the veto claimed &amp;#8220;the decision is &lt;a href="http://www.kansascity.com/news/breaking_news/story/541098.html"&gt;costing the state jobs and economic investment&lt;/a&gt;&amp;#8221; and warned of &amp;#8220;higher electric bills for Western Kansas,&amp;#8221; where the plants were proposed.&lt;/p&gt;


	&lt;p&gt;But a &lt;a href="http://www.innovestgroup.com/index.php?option=com_content&amp;#38;task=view&amp;#38;id=175&amp;#38;Itemid=61"&gt;landmark report released yesterday&lt;/a&gt; by an esteemed financial research firm finds that, in fact, Sebelius has been acting in her state&amp;#8217;s best economic interests.&lt;/p&gt;


	&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.innovestgroup.com/index.php?option=com_content&amp;#38;task=view&amp;#38;id=175&amp;#38;Itemid=61"&gt;Innovest Strategic Value Advisors finds&lt;/a&gt; that Sunflower Electric Power Corporation, the company whose proposal was denied, failed to account for the effects of the likely regulation of carbon dioxide on the cost of coal-fired electricity when it sought to build two 700 MW coal plants in Holcomb, Kansas:
&lt;blockquote&gt;Innovest examined the economics of the transaction and determined that under the most plausible regulatory scenarios &lt;strong&gt;the decision to build new coal generating capacity will put Sunflower Electric&amp;#8217;s ratepayers &#8211; who in this particular case are the actual owners &#8211; at significant risk&lt;/strong&gt;. The report concludes that Sunflower&amp;#8217;s management has not adequately addressed the competitive and financial risks associated with climate change in deciding to pursue the expansion of its Holcomb Station power plant.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/p&gt;


	&lt;p&gt;Sunflower was remiss in not considering that federal legislation that places a price on carbon emissions is extremely likely, considering the bipartisan support and strong international pressure for such action.&lt;/p&gt;


The report compares the economics of coal plants versus natural gas plants, which have a &lt;a href="http://www.eia.doe.gov/cneaf/electricity/page/co2_report/co2report.html"&gt;considerably smaller carbon footprint&lt;/a&gt;, and concludes:
&lt;blockquote&gt;In general, this analysis demonstrate that gas is the more financially sound choice for the construction of baseload generating capacity in all scenarios except 100% free allocation [to power companies] of carbon allowances.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

	&lt;p&gt;It is thus unsurprising that the coal lobby &lt;a href="/2007/11/05/kansas-coal-lobby-attacks-natural-gas-industry"&gt;attacked the natural gas industry&lt;/a&gt; when the decision was made.&lt;/p&gt;


	&lt;p&gt;The report also notes that western Kansas has &amp;#8220;among the nation&amp;#8217;s most abundant wind resources&amp;#8221; and that the cost of wind power has plummeted 80% in the last 20 years.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 19:04:00 -0500</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">urn:uuid:c963cea2-ed99-4df2-8731-76eecf69ec12</guid>
      <author>Wonk Room</author>
      <link>http://www.hillheat.com/articles/2008/03/26/report-vindicates-sebelius-coal%E2%80%99s-cost-puts-kansans-at-significant-risk</link>
      <category>Policy</category>
      <category>Legislation</category>
      <category>Action</category>
      <category>coal</category>
      <category>Massachusetts vs EPA</category>
      <category>natural gas</category>
      <category>wind</category>
      <category>Kansas</category>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.hillheat.com/articles/trackback/1986</trackback:ping>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
