The Place of NOAA & NIST in the Overall Science Enterprise
- Susan Avery, director, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution
- James W. Serum, president, SciTek Ventures
The State of the Renewable Fuels Industry in the Current Economy
- Nathan Kimpel, President and Chief Operating Officer, New Energy Corp.
- John Howe, Vice President of Public Affairs, Verenium Corporation
- Manning Feraci, Vice President of Federal Affairs, National Biodiesel Board
- Ron Litterer, Chairman, National Corn Growers Association
- Brooks Hurst, Member of the Board of Directors, The Paseo-Cargill Biofuels Plant, On Behalf of the Missouri Soybean Association
21st Century Water Planning: The Importance of a Coordinated Federal Approach
On Wednesday, March 4th, the Committee on Science and Technology will hold a hearing entitled “21st Century Water Planning: The Importance of a Coordinated Federal Approach” at 10:00 a.m. in room 2318 of the Rayburn House Office Building. The purpose of the hearing is to receive testimony on The National Water Research and Development Initiative Act and examine the opportunities for the federal government to better coordinate and support research and technological innovation.
The witnesses will provide testimony on the research needed to address the challenges of managing water supplies to meet social, economic and environmental needs in the United States to accommodate population growth, climatic variation, and other factors. In addition, they will discuss their views on the need for federal research and development in the areas of water supply, water conservation, and water management. The witnesses will offer their perspectives on The National Water Research and Development Initiative Act and discuss its relationship to other federal policies and legislative proposals.
Witnesses- Dr. Henry Vaux, Jr., Professor Emeritus, University of California, Berkley. From 1994 to 2001, Dr. Vaux served as Chair of the Committee of the Water Science and Technology Board which prepared a report in 2004 on federal research and development to address water resource issues. Dr. Vaux will testify on his work chairing the Committee and how The National Water Research and Development Initiative Act addresses the recommendations of the 2004 NRC report.
- Dr. Peter Gleick, President of the Pacific Institute for Studies in Development, Environment, and Security. The Pacific Institute is a research institute dedicated to addressing the connections between water and human health, the hydrologic impacts of climate change, sustainable water use, privatization and globalization, and international conflicts over water resources. Dr. Gleick will discuss his research and provide his perspective on The National Water Research and Development Initiative Act and its relationship to other federal programs and proposals.
- Mark Modzelewski, Co-founder Water Innovations Alliance. Created in 2008, the Alliance serves as an industry association working towards increasing water research funding, strengthening federal research and development, and improving education and outreach for water industry professionals. Mr. Modzelewski will offer an industry perspective to the need for increased federal research and development related to water.
- Nancy Stoner, Co-director of the Water Program at the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC). NRDC is a national, nonprofit organization of scientists, lawyers and environmental specialists with a long history of working to protect the nation’s waters. Ms. Stoner will offer an environmental perspective on the importance of additional federal efforts to ensure clean water supplies, her perspectives on the National Water Research and Development Initiative, and the legislation’s relationship to other federal programs and proposals.
- Christine Furstoss, General Manager of Technology, General Electric (GE) Water and Process Technologies. At GE, Ms. Furstoss leads approximately 350 technologists working on critical chemical, membrane, device and processing technologies aimed at providing water treatment, water reuse and efficient process system solutions. Ms. Furstoss will testify about her work in water technology development and the role of private industry in water science research.
BACKGROUND
The nation’s water policy remains essentially unchanged despite a myriad of reports recommending broad changes to address dwindling water supplies. Multi-year droughts continue to plague regions and states around the country, including the Southeast, Texas, and California. For many municipalities, intense competition for water and diminished supplies will force local water agencies to make tough decisions on water allocations including implementation of restrictions to protect essential ecosystem services.
Droughts, changing patterns of precipitation and snowmelt, and increased water loss due to evaporation as a result of warmer air temperatures are indicators that climate variability and climate change have impacts that are being felt across the United States.
The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’s (IPCC) latest report projects that water supplies stored in glaciers and snow cover will decline in the course of the century, thus reducing water availability in regions supplied by melt water from major mountain ranges.
January 2009, the driest month in California history, has left California’s reservoirs and rivers operating at near record lows. On February 20, the Bureau of Reclamation announced that a large percentage of agricultural contractors in the State are expected to receive no water deliveries this year due to California’s extreme drought and municipal contractors should count on receiving a 50 percent of their normal supply. The Bureau prepared two forecasts: a conservative forecast with a 90-percent chance of having runoff greater than forecasted and a median forecast with a 50-percent chance of having runoff greater than forecasted.
Recommendations for the Obama Administration
Last fall, the Pacific Institute’s Dr. Peter Gleick provided water policy recommendations to the next Administration. Dr. Gleick’s priorities include developing a comprehensive national water policy, spotlighting national security issues related to water, expanding the role of the U.S. in addressing global water problems, and integrating climate change into all federal water planning and activity.
The United State’s fresh water resources are used ineffectively due, in part, to a lack of a national water policy. Dr. Gleick argues, “If inefficient use and water contamination continue unabated, they will impoverish this and future generations, destroy the limited remaining aquatic ecosystems, and threaten our future food supply.”
In developing a 21st Century National Water Policy, the Pacific Institute recommends a reorganization of the diverse and uncoordinated federal water responsibilities and expanding the collection of water-use and water-quality data. In addition, the Institute calls for the re-establishment of a new national, bipartisan Water Commission for the 21st Century to evaluate and recommend changes to national water policy.
H.R. 1145: National Water Research and Development Initiative Act
The Committee held two hearings in the 110th Congress—on May 14, 2008 and July 23, 2008—on water supply research and development. At the hearings, witnesses discussed the need for better coordination of federal efforts on water, increased funding for research on the effects of climate change on groundwater, and improved consideration of efficient water use in energy systems. They also recommended that additional money be spent on public education programs.
Despite an interagency research budget of approximately $700 million, an increase in the number of water shortages and emerging conflicts over water supplies suggest that we are inadequately prepared to address the nation’s water management issues. The 2004 report by the National Research Council entitled Confronting the Nation’s Water Problems: The Role of Federal Research, advocates for a clear national water strategy to coordinate the 20 plus federal agencies responsible for conducting and funding research in order to avoid duplication and to tackle the looming challenges of maintaining adequate water supplies.
Chairman Gordon introduced the National Water Research and Development Initiative Act on September 23, 2008 following the Committee hearings (H.R. 6997) and in response to the recommendations in the Academy’s 2004 report.
Chairman Gordon reintroduced the legislation on February 24, 2009. H.R. 1145 coordinates federal research water efforts to ensure we have the best tools and information to maintain adequate supplies of water for Americans in the coming decades. The bill seeks to improve the federal government’s efforts in water research, development, demonstration, education, and technology transfer activities to address changes in water use, supply, and demand in the United States.
The bill codifies the Interagency Committee created in 2003, the Subcommittee on Water Availability and Quality (SWAQ) of the National Science and Technology Council’s Committee on Environment and Natural Resources. SWAQ was created to identify science and technology needs to address the growing issues related to freshwater supplies, develop a coordinated a multiyear plan to improve research on water supply and water quality, and to enhance the collection and availability of data needed to ensure an adequate water supply for the nation. H.R. 1145 incorporates suggestions in the National Academies’ 2004 report that are intended to strengthen the Committee. By strengthening the SWAQ and providing it explicit Congressional authorization, the recommendations of the 2007 SWAQ report8 will receive due consideration and form the start of a national strategy to ensure we have a sustainable water supply.
Information and recommendations from witnesses obtained through the two hearings in the 110th Congress and from other water experts were incorporated into the bill introduced in the 111th Congress. Specific recommendations that have been included in the current legislation include: an expanded list of research outcomes, specific mechanisms to increase public input and involvement in shaping and evaluating the Initiative, and provisions to facilitate communication and outreach opportunities with non-governmental organizations.
Additional Water Legislative Proposals
As Congress seeks to address future water supply challenges, it is important to consider how The National Water Research and Development Initiative Act relates to other federal policies and legislative proposals. Two bills that also address federal water policy are: H.R. 135, The 21st Century Water Commission Act and S. 22, The Omnibus Public Land Management Act of 2009.
H.R. 135: 21st Century Water Commission Act of 2009
H.R. 135 was introduced by Rep. John Linder (R-GA). This legislation would establish a Commission to provide for water assessments to project future water supply and demand, review current water management programs at all levels of government, and develop recommendations for a comprehensive water strategy. Modeled after the 1968 National Water Commission Act, H.R. 135 creates a commission consisting of non-federal experts appointed by the President, the Speaker of the House, and the Majority Leader of the Senate.
H.R. 135 requires the Commission to investigate a number of solutions to avert future water shortages including: aqueducts and pipelines, aquifer recharge, repairing aging infrastructure, building dams and reservoirs, desalination, the capture and storage of rainwater, recycled wastewater, conservation, and wetlands creation.
H.R. 135 complements the National Water Research and Development Initiative Act. The Commission’s recommendations would be carried out by the 20-plus agencies overseeing federal water policy. In order to effectively implement these recommendations, the federal government must have a coordinated structure in place.
S. 22: Omnibus Public Land Management Act of 2009
S. 22, The Omnibus Public Land Management Act of 2009, authorizes many programs and activities in the Department of the Interior and the Department of Agriculture related to public lands.
Title IX, Subtitle F of this legislation directs the Secretary of Interior to conduct a variety of activities related to water management on federal lands. The Secretary is required to establish a climate change adaptation program to address water management in watersheds containing federally authorized reclamation projects. The bill also directs the Secretary of Energy to conduct an assessment of potential climate change impacts on hydropower projects under the authority of the Federal Power Marketing Administration. In addition, S. 22 directs the Secretary of Interior to establish an interagency committee on water and climate change to review the impacts of climate change on freshwater resources in the U.S., to develop strategies to improve observations and expand data collection needed to assess climate impacts. The bill also provides an increased authorization for the U.S. Geological Service (USGS) for the National Streamflow Information Program and for expanded monitoring of groundwater resources.
H.R. 1145 ensures coordination of the research, development and demonstration activities of all federal agencies with expertise in water that will be required to develop the required assessments and the adaptive management strategies for water resources. Participation of the key federal agencies with expertise and authorities over water resources in the interagency committees authorized under these two bills will facilitate a transfer of coordinated research into coordinated water management policy.
The Place of NASA & NSF in the Overall Science Enterprise
- Lennard Fisk, professor of space science, University of Michigan
Fisk directed NAS’s Space Studies Board, the committee that released a report on Earth observations, from 2003-2008.
Fisk also served as NASA’s associate administrator for space science and applications from 1987 to 1993.
The Role Of Federal Lands In Combating Climate Change
Witnesses
Panel 1- Gail Kimbell, Chief, Forest Service, Department of Agriculture
- Thomas R. Armstrong, Senior Advisor for Global Change Program, U.S. Geological Survey, Department of the Interior
- Anthony Brunello, Deputy Secretary for Climate Change and Energy, California Natural Resources Agency
- Billy Frank, Chairman, Northwest Indian Fisheries Commission
- Mark E. Harmon, Ph.D., Richardson Chair and Professor in Forest Service, Oregon State University
- Dominick A. DellaSala, Ph.D., Chief Scientist and Executive Director of Programs, National Center for Conservation Science & Policy
- Jack Williams, Ph. D., Senior Scientist, Trout Unlimited
- Eugene Spiering, Vice President for Exploration, Quaterra Corporation
- Rick Ridgeway, Freedom to Roam
- Lynn Jungwirth, Executive Director, Watershed Research and Training Center
- Forrest McCarthy, Public Lands Director, Winter Wildlands Alliance
President Obama’s 2010 budget blueprint says climate change poses a threat to the United States’ fish and wildlife as natural habitats are modified more rapidly than plants and animals can adjust. Scientific analyses are needed to understand the breadth of these changes, it adds.“Federal land management agencies, states and tribes all need to update land management and species recovery plans to reflect the impacts of climate change on wildlife,” the plan says. “They also need to monitor how wildlife is adapting and accelerate projects, such as protecting migration corridors, to help wildlife adjust.”
The hearing likely also will focus on forests, which store large amounts of carbon, and fighting wildfires. Obama’s proposed budget would pump $50 million extra in the Forest Service budget as part of Obama’s “commitment to protecting and restoring our national forests as a cornerstone of a healthy, sustainable environment.”
The budget also proposes funding for climate change efforts on public lands. It includes increases of more than $130 million to assess and respond to climate change’s effects on wildlife, of which $40 million is shared with states for wildlife adaptation.
It also boosts by $10 million North American Wetlands Conservation Act activities to acquire, restore or protect wetlands used by migratory waterfowl and other birds. The administration plans to fully fund the act at $75 million by 2012.
Science Overview
- Ralph Cicerone, president, National Academy of Sciences
Managing Our Ocean and Wildlife Resources in a Dynamic Environment: Priorities for the New Administration and the 111th Congress
Witnesses
Panel 1- Mark F. Rockefeller, Chairman, Board of Directors, National Fish and Wildlife Foundation
- Peter Kareiva, Ph.D., Chief Scientist, The Nature Conservancy
- Barton H. Thompson, Jr., Perry L. McCarty Director, Woods Institute for the Environment, Stanford University
- John Baughman, Member, Sporting Conservation Council
- Shirley A. Pomponi, Ph.D., Executive Director, Harbor Branch Oceanographic Institute, Florida Atlantic University
- William Jackson, Ph.D., Deputy Director General, IUCN-USA Multilateral Office
- Franklin W. Nutter, President, Reinsurance Association of America
- Brian Rothschild, Ph.D., Montgomery Charter Professor of Marine Science, School for Marine Science and Technology, University of Massachusetts
The process of smart grid initiatives and technologies
The purpose of this oversight hearing is to examine the progress on smart grid initiatives authorized in the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007, and funded in the stimulus bill, and to learn of opportunities and impediments to timely installation of smart grid technologies.
Witnesses
Panel 1- Suedeen Kelly, Commissioner, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
- Patricia Hoffman, Department of Energy
- Dr. Patrick Gallagher, National Institute of Standards and Technology
- Frederick Butler, National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners
- Katherine Hamilton, GridWise Alliance
- Edward Lu, Google Inc.
- Evan Gaddis, National Electrical Manufacturers Association
Department of the Interior Oversight
- Robin Nazzaro, GAO director for natural resources and the environment
- Mary Kendall, Interior deputy inspector general
From E&E News:
“This is a pre-budget hearing to get an assessment from [watchdog agencies] on the functioning of the department,” said George Behan, chief of staff to Interior Appropriations Subcommittee Chairman Norm Dicks (D-Wash.).Robin Nazzaro, director for natural resources and the environment for the Government Accountability Office, said committee members did not give her any specifics on which issues to address when she testifies. “The focus is just oversight of the Department of Interior so we will talk about a number of areas that we feel are major management challenges for the department based on the work that we’ve done over the last few years,” she said Friday. . . Interior Deputy Inspector General Mary Kendall will testify about the many issues of concern to the IG’s office. Kendall is filling in for Inspector General Earl Devaney as he takes a leave to chair a federal watchdog panel overseeing the economic stimulus law.